| MLED Portfolio Summary Spring 2004 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| ECED N=29 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Task 1 | Criteria 1 | Criteria 2 | Criteria 3 | Criteria 4 | Criteria 5 | Criteria 6 | Criteria 7 | Criteria 8 | Criteria 9 | |||||||||||
| MLED N= | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Total Count | % Rating | |||||||||||||||||||
| # of Candidates Rated Highly Effective | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 29 | 80.56% | |||||||||
| # of Candidates Rated Acceptable | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 19.44% | |||||||||
| # of Candidates Rated Unacceptable | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | |||||||||
| % of Candidates Rated Highly Effective | 100.00% | 100.00% | 75.00% | 75.00% | 75.00% | 100.00% | 50.00% | 75.00% | 75.00% | 36 | ||||||||||
| % of Candidates Rated Acceptable | 0.00% | 0.00% | 25.00% | 25.00% | 25.00% | 0.00% | 50.00% | 25.00% | 25.00% | |||||||||||
| % of Candidates Rated Unacceptable | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | |||||||||||
| Task 2 | Criteria 1 | Critera 2 | Criteria 3 | Criteria 4 | Criteria 5 | |||||||||||||||
| MLED N= | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | |||||||||||||||
| Total Count | % Rating | |||||||||||||||||||
| # of Candidates Rated Highly Effective | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 13 | 65.00% | |||||||||||||
| # of Candidates Rated Acceptable | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 7 | 35.00% | |||||||||||||
| # of Candidates Rated Unacceptable | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||
| % of Candidates Rated Highly Effective | 100.00% | 50.00% | 50.00% | 25.00% | 100.00% | 20 | ||||||||||||||
| % of Candidates Rated Acceptable | 0.00% | 50.00% | 50.00% | 75.00% | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||
| % of Candidates Rated Unacceptable | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||
| Task 3 | Criteria 1 | Critera 2 | Criteria 3 | Criteria 4 | Criteria 5 | Criteria 6 | Criteria 7 | Criteria 8 | Criteria 9 | Criteria 10 | Critera 11 | Criteria 12 | Criteria 13 | Criteria 14 | Criteria 15 | |||||
| MLED N= | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | |||||
| Total Count | % Rating | |||||||||||||||||||
| # of Candidates Rated Highly Effective | 2 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 50 | 83.33% | |||
| # of Candidates Rated Acceptable | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 8.33% | |||
| # of Candidates Rated Unacceptable | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 8.33% | |||
| % of Candidates Rated Highly Effective | 50.00% | 75.00% | 100.00% | 75.00% | 100.00% | 75.00% | 100.00% | 75.00% | 100.00% | 75.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 75.00% | 50.00% | 60 | ||||
| % of Candidates Rated Acceptable | 50.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 25.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 50.00% | |||||
| % of Candidates Rated Unacceptable | 0.00% | 25.00% | 0.00% | 25.00% | 0.00% | 25.00% | 0.00% | 25.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 25.00% | 0.00% | |||||
| Task 4 | Criteria 1 | |||||||||||||||||||
| MLED N= | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | |||||||||||||
| Total Count | % Rating | |||||||||||||||||||
| # of Candidates Rated Highly Effective | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 26 | 92.86% | |||||||||||
| # of Candidates Rated Acceptable | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 7.14% | |||||||||||
| # of Candidates Rated Unacceptable | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | |||||||||||
| % of Candidates Rated Highly Effective | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 75.00% | 100.00% | 75.00% | 28 | ||||||||||||
| % of Candidates Rated Acceptable | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 25.00% | 0.00% | 25.00% | |||||||||||||
| % of Candidates Rated Unacceptable | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | |||||||||||||
| Task 5 | Criteria 1 | Critera 2 | Criteria 3 | Criteria 4 | Criteria 5 | |||||||||||||||
| MLED N= | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | |||||||||||||||
| Total Count | % Rating | |||||||||||||||||||
| # of Candidates Rated Highly Effective | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 20 | 100.00% | |||||||||||||
| # of Candidates Rated Acceptable | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||
| # of Candidates Rated Unacceptable | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||
| % of Candidates Rated Highly Effective | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 20 | ||||||||||||||
| % of Candidates Rated Acceptable | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||
| % of Candidates Rated Unacceptable | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||
| Task 6 | Criteria 1 | Critera 2 | Criteria 3 | |||||||||||||||||
| MLED N= | 4 | 4 | 4 | |||||||||||||||||
| Total Count | % Rating | |||||||||||||||||||
| # of Candidates Rated Highly Effective | 3 | 4 | 4 | 11 | 91.67% | |||||||||||||||
| # of Candidates Rated Acceptable | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8.33% | |||||||||||||||
| # of Candidates Rated Unacceptable | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||
| % of Candidates Rated Highly Effective | 75.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 12 | ||||||||||||||||
| % of Candidates Rated Acceptable | 25.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||||
| % of Candidates Rated Unacceptable | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||||
| Task 7 | Criteria 1 | Critera 2 | Criteria 3 | Criteria 4 | Criteria 5 | |||||||||||||||
| MLED N= | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | |||||||||||||||
| Total Count | % Rating | |||||||||||||||||||
| # of Candidates Rated Highly Effective | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 20 | 100.00% | |||||||||||||
| # of Candidates Rated Acceptable | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||
| # of Candidates Rated Unacceptable | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | |||||||||||||
| % of Candidates Rated Highly Effective | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 20 | ||||||||||||||
| % of Candidates Rated Acceptable | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||
| % of Candidates Rated Unacceptable | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | |||||||||||||||