ECED Portfolio Summary Spring 2004    
ECED N=29
Task 1 Criteria 1 Critera 2 Criteria 3 Criteria 4 Criteria 5 Criteria 6 Criteria 7 Criteria 8 Criteria 9 Task 1  
ECED N= 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 Task 1   Total Count % Rating
                    Total Count % Rating 95 36.40%
# of Candidates Rated Highly Effective 10 14 6 7 14 13 11 8 12 95 36.40% 158 60.54%
# of Candidates Rated Acceptable 19 15 21 18 15 14 18 21 17 158 60.54% 8 3.07%
# of Candidates Rated Unacceptable 0 0 2 4 0 2 0 0 0 8 3.07% 261  
% of Candidates Rated Highly Effective 34.48% 48.28% 20.69% 24.14% 48.28% 44.83% 37.93% 27.59% 41.38% 261      
% of Candidates Rated Acceptable 65.52% 51.72% 72.41% 62.07% 51.72% 48.28% 62.07% 72.41% 58.62% Task 2  
% of Candidates Rated Unacceptable 0.00% 0.00% 6.90% 13.79% 0.00% 6.90% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total Count % Rating
51 35.17%
Task 2 Criteria 1 Critera 2 Criteria 3 Criteria 4 Criteria 5 92 63.45%
ECED N= 29 29 29 29 29 Task 2   2 1.38%
            Total Count % Rating 145  
# of Candidates Rated Highly Effective 15 8 13 9 6 51 35.17%    
# of Candidates Rated Acceptable 14 21 16 19 22 92 63.45% Task 3  
# of Candidates Rated Unacceptable 0 0 0 1 1 2 1.38% Total Count % Rating
% of Candidates Rated Highly Effective 51.72% 27.59% 44.83% 31.03% 20.69% 145   204 46.90%
% of Candidates Rated Acceptable 48.28% 72.41% 55.17% 65.52% 75.86% 222 51.03%
% of Candidates Rated Unacceptable 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 3.45% 3.45% 9 2.07%
435  
Task 3 Criteria 1 Critera 2 Criteria 3 Criteria 4 Criteria 5 Criteria 6 Criteria 7 Criteria 8 Criteria 9 Criteria 10 Critera 11 Criteria 12 Criteria 13 Criteria 14 Criteria 15    
ECED N= 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 Task 3   Task 4  
                                Total Count % Rating Total Count % Rating
# of Candidates Rated Highly Effective 9 13 13 12 16 15 16 9 14 17 17 13 16 11 13 204 46.90% 78 38.42%
# of Candidates Rated Acceptable 17 15 16 17 13 14 13 19 15 12 11 16 13 15 16 222 51.03% 113 55.67%
# of Candidates Rated Unacceptable 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 9 2.07% 12 5.91%
% of Candidates Rated Highly Effective 31.03% 44.83% 44.83% 41.38% 55.17% 51.72% 55.17% 31.03% 48.28% 58.62% 58.62% 44.83% 55.17% 37.93% 44.83% 435   203  
% of Candidates Rated Acceptable 58.62% 51.72% 55.17% 58.62% 44.83% 48.28% 44.83% 65.52% 51.72% 41.38% 37.93% 55.17% 44.83% 51.72% 55.17%    
% of Candidates Rated Unacceptable 10.34% 3.45% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 3.45% 0.00% 0.00% 3.45% 0.00% 0.00% 10.34% 0.00% Task 5  
Total Count % Rating
57 39.31%
88 60.69%
Task 4 Criteria 1 Critera 2 Criteria 3 Criteria 4 Criteria 5 Criteria 6 Criteria 7 0 0.00%
ECED N= 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 Task 4   145  
                Total Count % Rating    
# of Candidates Rated Highly Effective 10 10 11 12 11 14 10 78 38.42% Task 6  
# of Candidates Rated Acceptable 19 18 16 13 16 13 18 113 55.67% Total Count % Rating
# of Candidates Rated Unacceptable 0 1 2 4 2 2 1 12 5.91% 32 36.78%
% of Candidates Rated Highly Effective 34.48% 34.48% 37.93% 41.38% 37.93% 48.28% 34.48% 203   55 63.22%
% of Candidates Rated Acceptable 65.52% 62.07% 55.17% 44.83% 55.17% 44.83% 62.07% 0 0.00%
% of Candidates Rated Unacceptable 0.00% 3.45% 6.90% 13.79% 6.90% 6.90% 3.45% 87  
   
Task 7  
Task 5 Criteria 1 Critera 2 Criteria 3 Criteria 4 Criteria 5 Total Count % Rating
ECED N= 29 29 29 29 29 Task 5   64 44.14%
            Total Count % Rating 81 55.86%
# of Candidates Rated Highly Effective 13 13 11 11 9 57 39.31% 0 0.00%
# of Candidates Rated Acceptable 16 16 18 18 20 88 60.69% 145  
# of Candidates Rated Unacceptable 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%
% of Candidates Rated Highly Effective 44.83% 44.83% 37.93% 37.93% 31.03% 145  
% of Candidates Rated Acceptable 55.17% 55.17% 62.07% 62.07% 68.97%
% of Candidates Rated Unacceptable 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Task 6 Criteria 1 Critera 2 Criteria 3
ECED N= 29 29 29 Task 6  
        Total Count % Rating
# of Candidates Rated Highly Effective 11 15 7 32 36.78%
# of Candidates Rated Acceptable 18 14 22 55 63.22%
# of Candidates Rated Unacceptable 0 0 0 0 0.00%
% of Candidates Rated Highly Effective 37.93% 51.72% 24.14% 87  
% of Candidates Rated Acceptable 62.07% 48.28% 75.86%
% of Candidates Rated Unacceptable 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Task 7 Criteria 1 Critera 2 Criteria 3 Criteria 4 Criteria 5
ECED N= 29 29 29 29 29 Task 7  
            Total Count % Rating
# of Candidates Rated Highly Effective 15 11 19 12 7 64 44.14%
# of Candidates Rated Acceptable 14 18 10 17 22 81 55.86%
# of Candidates Rated Unacceptable 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00%
% of Candidates Rated Highly Effective 51.72% 37.93% 65.52% 41.38% 24.14% 145  
% of Candidates Rated Acceptable 48.28% 62.07% 34.48% 58.62% 75.86%
% of Candidates Rated Unacceptable 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%