Exit Portfolio Task #6 Formal Evaluations of My Teaching Rubric
Note: All data taken from Mr. Scott Adams Access Database (Table 'Task 6) Under 'Internship'/ Exit Internship / Portfolio / Portfolio data Spring 2003					Criteria
Evaluator's Name	# of Students	Date	Program	Major	1	2	3			Commetns
Timothy Leggett	1	4/29/2003	ECED	ECED	3	3	2
Byra Ramsey	2	4/27/2003	ECED	ECED	2	2	2
sammie stephenson	3	4/28/2003	ECED	ECED	2	2	2
Timothy Leggett	4	4/29/2003	ECED	ECED	3	2	2
sammie stephenson	5	4/29/2003	ECED	ECED	2	2	2
Gwen Morgan	6	4/28/2003	ECED	ECED	2	2	2
Sid Womack	7	5/5/2003	ECED	ECED	2	2	2			In hard copy.
Byra Ramsey	8	4/28/2003	ECED	ECED	2	3	2
Sammie Stephenson	9	4/28/2003	ECED	ECED	0	0	0
David Bell	10	4/29/2003	ECED	ECED	2	3	3			Keep this up and you will be able to improve your teaching by using reflection.  Well done.
Sammie Stephenson	11	4/28/2003	ECED	ECED	2	2	2
Sammie Stephenson	12	4/28/2003	ECED	ECED	2	2	2
Timothy Leggett	13	4/29/2003	ECED	ECED	3	3	2
Gwen Morgan	14	4/28/2003	ECED	ECED	3	2	2
Timothy Leggett	15	4/29/2003	ECED	ECED	3	3	3
David Bell	16	4/23/2003	ECED	ECED	3	3	3			Very specific.  Do you still think you should not have a 1-2 on your assessment strategies?
Sid Womack	17	4/29/2003	ECED	ECED	2	3	3			Very complete reflections.
Byra Ramsey	18	4/28/2003	ECED	ECED	2	2	2
Michelle Linch	19	4/29/2003	ECED	ECED	2	2	3			Be a little more reflective on student learning!
David Bell	20	4/29/2003	ECED	ECED	3	3	3			Great use of reflections to improve your teaching.
Sid Womack	21	4/28/2003	ECED	ECED	2	2	2			Through no fault of her own, the commentary files could not be opened.
David Bell	22	4/28/2003	ECED	ECED	3	3	3
David Bell	23	4/29/2003	ECED	ECED	2	2	2
Sammie Stephenson	24	4/28/2003	ECED	ECED	2	2	2
Byra Ramsey	25	4/27/2003	ECED	ECED	2	2	2			Informal and Formal evaluations: When doing formal
Timothy Leggett	26	4/29/2003	ECED	ECED	3	3	2
Byra Ramsey	27	4/29/2003	ECED	ECED	2	2	2
Gwen Morgan	28	4/28/2003	ECED	ECED	2	2	2
Byra Ramsey	29	4/27/2003	ECED	ECED	2	2	2
Sid Womack	30	4/29/2003	ECED	ECED	2	2	2
Byra Ramsey	31	4/21/2003	ECED	ECED	3	2	2
Timothy Leggett	32	4/29/2003	ECED	ECED	3	2	2
Gwen Morgan	33	5/12/2003	ECED	ECED	2	2	2
Byra Ramsey	34	4/27/2003	ECED	ECED	2	2	2
Timothy Leggett	35	4/29/2003	ECED	ECED	3	3	2
Gwen Morgan	36	4/28/2003	ECED	ECED	3	2	3
Michelle Linch	37	4/27/2003	MLED	math/ science	3	3	3
Michelle Linch	38	4/30/2003	MLED	math/ science	3	2	2
Michelle Linch	39	4/27/2003	MLED	math/ science	3	2	3
Connie Zimmer	40	4/25/2003	SEED	Business	3	3	3			All elements of the task were completed at the highly effective ranking.
Connie Zimmer	41	4/25/2003	SEED	H/PE K-12	3	3	3			The required elements of this task were met fully. The reflection upon the two lessons showed a depth of understanding that could be compared to teachers already in the field.
Connie Zimmer	42	5/7/2003	SEED	History	3	2	2			Items for this task had to be added before it could be evaluated.  There are a few grammatical errors of the type that spell check would not catch.
Connie Zimmer	43	4/29/2003	SEED	H/PE K-12	3	3	2			Lindsey did excellent reflections dealing with the two evaluations.
Connie Zimmer	44	5/7/2003	SEED	Business	3	2	2			Good "Monitor and Adjust". I have had the same thing happen to me.
Gwen Morgan	45	4/28/2003	SEED	English	2	2	2
Patricia B. Roach	46	4/24/2003	SEED	Music	3	3	3			very sophisticated analysis of personal and professional growth.
Scott Adams	47	4/24/2003	SEED	HPE	2	2	3			Better job composing the reflection this time.
Scott Adams	48	4/24/2003	SEED	HPE	2	1	2			More reflection was needed with different wording than exists in the document.
Scott Adams	49	4/29/2003	SEED	HPE	2	2	2			Reflection was adequate, but more detail would enlighten the situation and circumstances surrounding classroom conflict.
Scott Adams	50	4/23/2003	SEED	Life science	2	2	2			Good honest reflection. Indicated surprise when observer evaluated her better than she felt.
Sid Womack	51	5/7/2003	SEED	MUED	2	2	3			Evals were delivered in hard copy form.
Sid Womack	52	5/6/2003	SEED	BIOL	2	2	3
Sid Womack	53	5/5/2003	SEED	MUED	3	3	3			Communicates well in writing both about music and education.
Tim Carter	54	4/29/2003	SEED	HPE	2	1	2			It appears from the observation forms that your lessons went very well.  However, again, purposeful reflection is a sign of professionalism in your field and this needs to continue to be a goal for you as you become a more knowledgeable professional.
Tim Carter	55	4/29/2003	SEED	Music	2	2	2			Continue to consider what you might do to modify things if the classroom were yours.
Tim Carter	56	4/27/2003	SEED	Math	2	3	2			It is clear that you (as stated in your beliefs about teaching and learning) consider professional improvement to be important.
Tim Carter	57	4/29/2003	SEED	Art	2	3	3			It is clear that you have considered input from other professionals in your instruction and have reflected upon it.  This is a goal of collegial professionalism.  It is important that, as you have noted, that you continue to improve as a professional
Tim Carter	58	4/29/2003	SEED	HPE	2	2	2			May want to consider feedback more in-depth in your reflections.  Elementary seemed to be your strongest area of the two.
Tim Carter	59	4/27/2003	SEED	Math	2	3	3			Excellent reflections.  It appears that being a "reflective professional" is something that you take seriously.
Scott Adams	60	4/29/2003	SEED	English	2	2	3
Scroll Down & Over to See Summary By Programs				Task 6
				Overall Programs N=	60	60	60
								Total Count	% Rating
				Total Category 3	23	20	20	63	35.59%
				Total Category 2	36	37	39	112	-63.28%
				Total Category 1	0	2	0	2	1.13%
				% of Times in Category 3	38.33%	33.33%	33.33%	177
				% of Times in Category 2	60.00%	61.67%	65.00%
				% of Times in Category 1	0.00%	3.33%	0.00%
				Task 6
				ECED N=	36	36	36
								Total Count	% Rating
				Total Category 3	13	11	8	32	30.48%
				Total Category 2	22	24	27	73	69.52%
				Total Category 1	0	0	0	0	0.00%
				% of Times in Category 3	36.11%	30.56%	22.22%	105
				% of Times in Category 2	61.11%	66.67%	75.00%
				% of Times in Category 1	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
				Task 6
				MLED N=	3	3	3
								Total Count	% Rating
				Total Category 3	3	1	2	6	66.67%
				Total Category 2	0	2	1	3	33.33%
				Total Category 1	0	0	0	0	0.00%
				% of Times in Category 3	100.00%	33.33%	66.67%	9
				% of Times in Category 2	0.00%	66.67%	33.33%
				% of Times in Category 1	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
				Task 6
				SEED N=	21	21	21
								Total Count	% Rating
				Total Category 3	7	8	10	25	39.68%
				Total Category 2	14	11	11	36	57.14%
				Total Category 1	0	2	0	2	3.17%
				% of Times in Category 3	33.33%	38.10%	47.62%	63
				% of Times in Category 2	66.67%	52.38%	52.38%
				% of Times in Category 1	0.00%	9.52%	0.00%