**Program Assessment Form
(At least one of
these forms should be completed for each educational support service unit)
Educational Support Service Unit: School of Education __________ Planning Cycle 2003-2004 Year _____ Page _1_ of _3_
|
Educational Support Service Objectives *
3-5 major ones for each educational support unit recommended |
Measures to be Used/Criteria for Success How
will you measure the outcome? Multiple
measures may be used. To what degree, do you expect these outcomes to be
present? |
Actual Results Obtained When
you measured, (observed, surveyed, etc.) what did you find? |
Uses of Results for What
impact did this have on the unit? How will you use this for improvements?
This should lead Directly to next year’s plan. |
|
1. To ensure that the professional education curriculum prepares teacher candidates to teach all students in the PK-12 school |
1a. Analysis of Praxis II specialty area assessments. Programs will analyze data and program changes may be made based on data analysis 1b. Analysis of Praxis II Principles of Learning and Teaching pedagogical assessment. Program change may be made based upon data analysis 1c. Analysis of Exit Portfolio summative data. Program changes may be made upon data analysis 1d. Analysis of
survey data to graduates who are first year teachers employed in 1e. Analysis of Praxis III data supplied by the Arkansas Department of Education. (Begin in 2003) |
After analysis of the data programs will make any needed changes. After analysis of the data program making any needed changes. Changes are being made in Secondary Education and should be reflected in their assessment plan. After analysis of the data program making any needed changes. Graduates are satisfied with the quality of education that
they received at Praxis III scores are way above the state average |
Program will make necessary changes and will be reflected on the program assessment plan. Program will make needed changes and will be reflected on the program assessment plan. . Programs will make needed changes and will be reflected on the program assessment plan. No changes needed at present. On going process each year. Will continue analysis. No changes needed at present. |
|
2. To ensure that
department heads and faculty members in the |
2a. Email pertinent information and reminders to faculty in a reasonal time (ex. within one day) after it becomes available. 2b. The School Leadership Team (department heads and the Director of Teacher Education Student Services) will meet regularly (ex. bimonthly) as documented by agendas etc. 2c. Discuss as appropriate Deans Council agenda items of Deans Council with Leadership Team at the regularly scheduled meetings 2d. Send a representative to Deans Council when dean is unable to attend. |
This has been completed This is being done. This is being done at the School Leadership Team Meeting. Is being done in the absence of the Dean |
Has improved communication and efficiency. Has improved communication and efficiency. Has improved communication and efficiency. Keeps communication on-going. |
|
3a. Establishment of an NCATE Self Study Writing Team for each standard by September,2003. 3b. Schedule meetings of NCATE Steering Committee regularly (ex. bimonthly) to work on accreditation issues. 3c. Reach consensus on the update of the changing conceptual framework by November, 2003 . 3d. Design electronic “exhibits room” and determine documents list be October, 2003 3e. Begin process of uploading documents by October, 2003.
3f. Continued refinement of Unit Assessment Plan |
Completed. This is being done and will continue. Completed. Completed. Completed. Completed. But is on-going. |
Significant impact because without the writing team the unit would not be ready for the NCATE visit in April 2005. Has improved the preparation for the NCATE visit for continuing accreditation. Has been shared with all stakeholders and is the foundation of the unit. Is continually updated. This made a significant impact on the operation of the unit and will make the unit more efficient and reduce the preparation for future NCATE accreditation visits. On going refinement. |
|
4. To improve communication with departments housing secondary education programs |
4a. Have regularly scheduled meetings (ex. monthly) on accreditation issues and curriculum revision and improvement |
This is being done and will continue. |
Has improved communication with the content areas across campus. |
|
|
|
|
|
(Use TAB key to go from cell to cell. Tabbing in the last cell will add a new row. Each cell will expand downward to accommodate additional text.)