Rubric for Field Project
Students
Name:_______________________________
Grade:______
ECED 3023 Foundations of Early
Childhood Education
Grade: The most frequent and
highest number
3=A 2=B 1=C 0=Not passing
ECED 3023
Assignment-Field Project |
Standards INTASC ATU Core Values Pathwise |
Below Basic (0-4 points)
Does not meet expectations |
Proficient (5-8 points)
Meets Expectations |
Advanced (9-10 points)
Exceeds Expectations |
Instructor Comments |
Total Points for this
section |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Classroom Demographics) |
NAEYC Standard 1,3 INTASC 2, 3, 5, 7 ATU Core Values 1, 2 Pathwise A, B, C |
Classroom drawing are not
addressed |
Classroom drawing are
present and meet basic requirements |
Classroom drawing are
detailed showing Centers |
|
|
|
(Outside Demographics) (Program Philosophies) |
NAEYC Standard 1, 3 INTASC 2, 3, 5, 7, 8 ATU Core Values 1,2 Pathwise A, B, C NAEYC Standard 1, 2 INTASC 2, 3, 5, 7 ATU Core Values 1, 5 Pathwise A, B,
C, D |
Playground drawing are not
addressed No philosophy is given for
each center |
Playground drawing are
present and meet basic requirements Four different philosophies
are included in this project |
Playground drawing are
detailed showing Outside Learning Centers Four philosophies represent
insight and reflection on the part of student |
|
|
|
(Assessment) (Comparison of Each Program) |
NAEYC Standard 3 INTASC 5, 7, 8 ATU Core Values 2 Pathwise A, B, C, NAEYC Standard 1, 3, 4 INTASC 2, 3, 5, 7, 8 ATU Core Values 2, 3 Pathwise A, B, C |
Assessment is not present or
only somewhat related to the program No Comparisons are given
with the various programs |
Brief Assessment of the four
types of programs Comparisons meet most requirements |
Detailed Assessment of all
programs incorporating Standards, objectives Comparisons show in-depth
critical thinking |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Case Study) |
NAEYC Standard 1,2, 3, 4 INTASC 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10 ATU Core Values 1, 2, 3, 4,
5 Pathwise b., c, d |
No observation of a child |
Observation reflects
essential knowledge of the child |
Observation reflects an
in-depth knowledge of current educational
issues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( Standards) (Organization) (Thesis) (References) (Support Material) |
NAEYC Standard 1, 4, 5 INTASC 2, 3, 5, 6, 9, 10 ATU Core Values 1, 2, 4, 5 Pathwise B, C, D NAEYC Standard 5 INTASC 6, 9, 10 ATU Core Values 2, 4, 5 Pathwise B, C, D NAEYC Standard 5 INTASC 6, 9, 10 ATU Core Values 2, 4, 5 Pathwise B, C, D NAEYC Standard 5 INTASC 6, 9, 10 ATU Core Values 2, 4, 5 Pathwise B, C, D NAEYC Standard 3, 5 INTASC 6, 9, 10 ATU Core Values 2, 4, 5 Pathwise B, C, D |
No standards are
mention. Work is not tied to
significant Standards Weak organization of ideas There is no clear purpose of
the paper No references or incorrect
references No supporting materials are
included |
Some relevant Standards are
referenced. Assignment is influenced
by standards Logical organization of
ideas Evidence of thesis can be
found and author generally maintains purpose Use of references indicate
some research Supporting materials are
clear and complete. |
Lesson is guided by
Standards Careful and relevant
organization of ideas Maintains clear purpose via
suitable voice and tone Use of references indicate
substantial research Supporting materials are
clear, complete. Materials enhance
lesson significantly. |
|
|
|
Summarized Evidence in Place |
Interpretation of Evidence |
How Evidence Used to Improve Program |
|
Grades from ECED 3023 Years 2003-2004 A’s = 83%; B’s = 14%; C’s = 0%; D’s = 0%; F’s =0% Withdraws = 3% |
Grades indicate that 97 % of teacher candidates posses a good basic knowledge of child growth and development |
Analyze the 98% of those who were successful to determine the factors that made them successful |
Rubric for Field Project
Students
Name:________________________________
Grade:______
ECED
2002 Autobiography and Philosophy
Grade:
The most frequent and highest number
3=A 2=B 1=C 0=Not passing
ECED 2002
Assignment-Autobiography
& Philosophy |
Standards INTASC ATU Core Values Pathwise |
Below
Basic (0-4 points) Does not meet expectations |
Proficient
(5-8 points) Meets Expectations |
Advanced
(9-10 points) Exceeds Expectations |
Instructor
Comments |
Total
Points for this section |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Meaningful Development of
ideas) |
NAEYC 4, 5 INTASC 6, 9, 10 ATU Core Values 2, 3, 4,
5 Pathwise B, C, D |
Ideas are unclear and/or not
well developed |
Depth
of thought supported by elaborated, relevant supportive evidence provides
clear vision of the idea; contains details |
Depth
and complexity of thought supported by rich, pertinent details; supporting
evidence leads to high-level idea development |
|
|
|
(Appraisal: Interpret
events. Determine impact. Determine
effectiveness. Determine the
relationship to goals, values and philosophy (Program Philosophies) |
INTASC 5, 7, 8 ATU Core Values 2 Pathwise A, B, NAEYC Standard 1, 2, 5 INTASC 2, 3, 5, 7 ATU Core Values 1, 3, 5 Pathwise A, B, C, D |
Fails to interpret the
activity or evidence and evaluate its appropriateness and impact No philosophy is given |
Adequate interpretation of
the activity or evidence and evaluates its appropriateness and impact. Philosophies are included in
this project |
Excellent interpretation of
the activity or evidence and evaluates its appropriateness and impact. Philosophies represent
insight and reflection on the part of student |
|
|
|
(Assessment) Description: Who? What?
When? Where? |
NAEYC 3 INTASC 5, 7, 8 ATU Core Values 2 Pathwise A, B, C NAEYC 1, 4, 5 INTASC 2, 3, 5, 6, 9, 10 ATU Core Values 1, 2, 3,
4, 5 Pathwise A, B, C, D |
Assessment is not present or
only somewhat related to the program Description is incomplete or
inadequate. |
Brief Assessment of the
programs Description gives an
adequate review of circumstance, situation, or issues and adequately mentions
who, what, when, where, and why. |
Detailed Assessment of all
programs incorporating Standards, objectives Full and complete
description of the circumstances, situations, or issues related to the
evidence or artifact. Who, what, when
are where are fully described. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transformation: Utilize
information and data |
NAEYC Standard 4, 5 INTASC 6, 7, 9, 10 ATU Core Values 1, 2, 3, 4,
5 Pathwise B, C, D |
Fails
to describe the manner in which the insights gained will improve and
transforms ones’ own teaching practice. |
Adequately
describes the manner in which the insights gained will improve and transform
ones’ own teaching practice. |
Excellent
description of the manner in which the insights gained will improve and
transform one’s own teaching practice |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( Standards) (Structural Organization) (Thesis) (Support Material) |
NAEYC Standard 1, 4, 5 INTASC 2, 3. 5, 6, 9, 10 ATU Core Values 1, 2, 4, 5 Pathwise B, C, D NAEYC Standard 5 INTASC 6, 9, 10 ATU Core Values 2, 4, 5 Pathwise B, C, D NAEYC Standard 5 INTASC 6, 9, 10 ATU Core Values 2, 4, 5 Pathwise B, C, D NAEYC Standard 5 INTASC 6, 9, 10 ATU Core Values 2, 4, 5 Pathwise B, C, D |
No standards are
mention. Work is not tied to
significant Standards Lacks logical progression of
ideas There is no clear purpose of
the paper No supporting materials are
included |
Some relevant Standards are
referenced. Assignment is influenced
by standards Logical progression of ideas
aided by clear transitions Evidence of thesis can be
found and author generally maintains purpose Supporting materials are
clear and complete. |
Lesson is guided by
Standards Powerfully organized and
fully developed Maintains clear purpose via
suitable voice and tone Supporting materials are
clear, complete. Materials enhance
lesson significantly. |
|
|
Rubric for Research Project
Students
Name:________________________________
Grade:______
ECED
3033 Child Development
Grade:
The most frequent and highest number
3=A 2=B 1=C 0=Not passing
ECED 3033
Assignment-Research Project |
INTASC ATU Core Values Pathwise |
Below
Basic (0-4 points) Does not meet expectations |
Proficient
(5-8 points) Meets Expectations |
Advanced
(9-10 points) Exceeds Expectations |
Instructor
Comments |
Total
Points for this section |
|
|
|
|
|
< |