ECED 3272 Guiding Young Children (Ages 6-9) Block II Case Study 3272 Case Study Fall 2004

	Not Met (0-5)	Met (6-8)	Exceeded (9-10)	Your Score
Student's Background STANDARDS Pathwise: A1, B2 AR: 4 NAEYC: 2 ECED Program Outcomes: 2	Candidates did not demonstrate the importance of children's backgrounds and development.	Candidates demonstrate the importance of knowing about and understanding individual children’s backgrounds and development (strengths and weaknesses).	Candidates demonstrated the importance of knowing about and understanding individual children’s backgrounds (family group, race, culture, socioeconomic level, levels of learning ) and development as well as how the information was gained (several sources).
Behavioral Objective STANDARDS Pathwise: A2, B3, C1 AR: 2 NAEYC: 3 ECED Program Outcomes: 3	Candidates did not demonstrate the elements of good behavioral objectives.	Candidates demonstrate the elements of good behavioral objectives.	Candidates demonstrate the elements of good behavioral objectives that can be understood by children and thus a focus for learning.
Modification and/or intervention. STANDARDS Pathwise: A3, A4, B4, B5, C2, C3, C5, AR: 1-4 NAEYC: 2, 3 ECED Program Outcomes: 2, 3 ISTE: II, III, V, VI	Candidates did not demonstrate the use of modifications and intervention to aid children and their families.	Candidates demonstrate the use of modifications and interventions that aid children and their families.	Candidates demonstrate the use of modifications and interventions that include assistive technology and/or enhanced learning through technology to aid children and their families.
An Instrument is used to measure levels of behaviors (prior to, during, and at the end of the study). STANDARDS Pathwise: A4 AR: 2 NAEYC: 3 ECED Program Outcomes: 1 3 ISTE: IV	Candidates did not demonstrate the correct use of an instrument or did not have an instrument to measure and record student growth.	Candidates demonstrate the correct use of an instrument that measures and records student growth.	Candidates demonstrate the correct use of an instrument that measures and records student growth and includes an explanations for each stage (prior, during, and end) of the study. The information was recorded in a graph and shared with the student and/or the family.
Analyze the impact on student learning with a computer graphic. STANDARDS Pathwise: A5, C4, D1, D2, AR: 2, 3 NAEYC: 1, 3 ECED Program Outcomes: 1, 3 ISTE: I, II, IV, V	Candidates did not demonstrate measurement of the objective and/or a method for reporting impact on student learning.	Candidates demonstrate appropriate measurement of the objective and/or a method for reporting impact on student learning.	Candidates demonstrate appropriate measurement of the objective and/or a method for reporting impact on student learning in an in-depth and professional manner.
Reflection STANDARDS Pathwise: D1, D3, D4 ECED Program Outcomes: 1-5 AR: 1-5 NAEYC: 1-5 ECED Program Outcomes: 1-5 ISTE: V, VI	Candidates did not demonstrate the importance of reflecting on the case study process and progress.	Candidates demonstrate the importance of reflecting on the case study process and progress with “next step” recommendations for colleagues and/or parents.	Candidates demonstrate the importance of reflecting on the case study process and progress with “next step” recommendations for colleagues and/or parents using research and Internet web sources.
Mechanics STANDARDS Pathwise: 5 AR: 5 NAEYC: 5 ECED Program Outcomes: 1-5 ISTE: I, VI	Candidates did not demonstrate technology skills and/or proper grammar in creating and documenting the case study.	Candidates demonstrate technology skills and/or proper grammar in creating and documenting the case study.	Candidates demonstrate outstanding technology skills and proper grammar in creating and documenting the case study.