ECED 3262 Assessment (Ages 6-9) Academic Case Study NAEYC: 1,2,3,4,5b,c,d,e
	Below Expectations	Meets Expectations	Exceeds Expectations		Your Score
Demonstrates knowledge of the age of the child and the importance of accessing pertinent, detailed, personal family and academic information	Does not meet requirement by missing one of the criteria or giving incomplete or vague details	Meets expectations giving adequate and pertinent personal, family, and academic information including the age of the child	Exceeds expectations giving greatly detailed personal, family and academic information including the age of the child
Demonstrates the importance of identifying and stating the child's academic problem accurately and clearly	Does not meet requirements by vaguely stating the child's academic problem or omitting it altogether	Meets expectations by clearly stating the child's academic problem	Exceeds expectations by clearly and logically stating and describing the child's academic problem
Demonstrates the understanding of valid forms of assessment used in the Case Study	Does not meet requirement by omitting to explain at least one assessment procedure that was appropriate in the Case Study	Meets expectations by stating and explaining at least one appropriate assessment procedure used in the Case Study	Exceeds expectations by stating and explaining fully at least two appropriate assessment procedures used in the Case Study coordinated appropriately with the Bloom's Taxonomy
Demonstrates the understanding and usefulness of appropriate intervention strategies used with the child with an academic problem	Does not meet requirement by vaguely stating intervention strategies or omitting strategies altogether	Meets expectations by clearly stating appropriate intervention strategies used with the child	Exceeds expectations by clearly stating and explaining in sequence and detail appropriate intervention strategies used with the child
Demonstrates the importance of acting as a consultant and making recommendations for future growth of the child after the academic study is concluded	Does not meet expectations because of no evidence of stating any recommendations at all or stating one or more inappropriate recommendations including possible faulty reasoning	Meets expectations by stating one appropriate individualized recommendations for future growth of the child	Exceeds expectations by stating at least two, valid proactive, creative, individualized detailed recommendations for future growth of the child
Demonstrates the understanding ofthe practitioner reflecting on his/her teaching and learning experience in a powerful and convincing way	Does not meet expectation because of brevity or obvious lack of conviction in relaying thoughts about the learning experience	Meets expectations by adequately relaying the benefits of working with the child in the Case Study	Exceeds expectations by reflecting on his/her teaching and learning experience in this Case Study in a powerful and convincing way
Demonstrates the understanding and application of writing clear content with clarity and free of mechanical errors.	Did not meet expectations. The Case Study had obvious problems with organization, clarity and/or mechanics that interfered with effective communication	Meets expectations. The case study is well, written, well sequenced, well-developed and free of most mechanical errors	Meets expectations. The Case Study is written with exceptional clarity, of the highest quality and is free of any mechanical errors
The final paper is a minimum of 3 to 5 double spaced pages	Below expectations. The final paper did not meet all requirements and was below 3 pages	Meets expectations. The final paper followed the requirements and was a minimum of three full pages	Meets expectations - The final paper followed the requirements and 5 full pages or more
COMMENTS