|
ECED 3213 Integrated Curriculum (Ages 6-9) Block II (Electronic) Integrated Unit CURRICULUM II and LANGUAGE AND LITERACY II UNIT RUBRIC |
|
|
Connections to Standards |
Below Expectations |
Meets Expectations |
Exceeds Expectations |
Your Score |
|
Demonstrates knowledge of content by designing a unit based on how children, ages 6-9, learn and develop language skills. |
NAEYC
1a,4b,4c,4d; |
Meets less than half the requirements for developing a thematic integrated unit. |
Meets the requirements; Good integration of language arts and content subject areas; Good planning and organization of content in most areas. |
Exceeds requirements; well-developed, integrative and emphasis on immersing children in language arts and content areas as they build language and literacy skills. |
|
|
Demonstrates ability to synthesize and summarize overall purpose for unit and the key concepts and skills that will effect children's learning and language development. |
NAEYC 1 |
Little evidence in narrative of overall perspective, purpose, content and skills of the unit. |
Good evidence in narrative of ability to summarize the purpose, content and skills to be taught in the unit. |
Strong evidence in narrative of ability to synthesize and summarize the overall purpose, content, and skills to be taught in the unit. |
|
|
Demonstrates planning and implementing of developmentally appropriate curriculum aligned with standards. |
NAEYC
1,3,4b,4c,4d; |
Little evidence of standards-based planning and implementation of an integrated thematic unit. |
Good evidence of standards-based planning and implementation; some opportunities to practice and apply language, social and intellectual skills as the topic is integrated with other areas of the curriculum. |
Strong
evidence of standards-based planning and implementation; Multiple |
|
|
Demonstrates understanding of selecting materials, technology, and other tools for teaching and learning. |
NAEYC
4b,4c,4d. |
Little evidence of a variety of materials, technology and other tools for teaching and learning. |
Good evidence of a variety of materials, technology and other tools that are developmentally appropriate for teaching and learning. |
Strong evidence that multiple resources were utilized in designing the unit. A wide variety of materials and literature has been selected, technology will be integrated, and other tools that are developmentally appropriate will be utilized. |
|
|
Demonstrates understanding of diversity through the development of learning experiences for all children. |
NAEYC
1,2,4a; |
Little evidence of considering the demographics and exceptionalities in the class. Few activities planned to provide experiences for common understanding of theme by all children. |
Good evidence of considering the demographics and exceptionalities in the class; relating prior experiences to the theme, providing some experiences for building backgrounds and vocabularies for common understanding of theme by all children. |
Strong evidence of considering the demographics and exceptionalities in the class; modifications are planned to include all children in the unit activities and lessons; rich and varied activities are planned to provide experiences for common understanding of theme by all children. |
|
|
Demonstrates lesson planning using methodologies to promote and engage students in meaningful and integrative experiences. |
NAEYC
1,2,4a,4b,4c,4d; |
Does not meet requirements for lesson planning using format in Taskstream. Plans have few opportunities for children to integrate language areas and content areas. Objectives and assessments are not consistent. |
Meets requirements for lessson planning using format and template in Taskstream. Includes many opportunities for children to use their language skills while actively involved in the thematic unit. |
Exceeds requirements for lesson planning using format and template in Taskstream. Multiple opportunities for children to use language skills while actively involved in meaningful, thematic experiences of the unit. |
|
|
Demonstrates development of daily plans for two weeks showing evidence of integration of curriculum areas. |
NAEYC
1,2,4a,4b,4c,4d; |
Little evidence of cohesiveness among daily plans; Guiding questions do not relate to all of the subject areas; Too few areas are integrated per day; Lacks fluidity of subject areas. |
Good evidence of cohesiveness among daily plans; Guiding questions focused the daily learning in various subject areas; Three subject areas were integrated per day. Some problems with fluidity of subject areas. |
Strong evidence of cohesiveness among daily plans; Guiding questions were complex or open- ended, but were focused on what children would be learning. Exceptional ability to select those subject areas and activities that provide the maximum learning experiences for children. |
|
|
Demonstrates understanding of appropriate assessments for learning objectives. |
NAEYC
3,4b,4c,4d; |
Little evidence of an effective assessment plan for a two week integrated unit. |
Good evidence for assessment plan that will be effective for what children will be learning; Assessments are varied and connected to unit objectives. |
Strong evidence for assessment plan that will be effective for what children know and are able to do; Plans include varied and multiple assessments connected appropriately to unit and lesson objectives. |
|
|
Demonstrates importance of parent involvement. |
NAEYC
1,2,3,4a |
Little or no evidence of planning for parental involvement. |
Good evidence of planning for involving parents in the integrated unit. Specific activities are planned. |
Strong evidence of planning for involving parents in the integrated unit; Multiple opportunities for involvement; Creative ideas for attracting parents to the classroom. |
|
|
Demonstrates reflection and self-evaluation. |
NAEYC 5; |
Some evidence of reflection and self-evaluation that revisits the development of the integrated unit. |
Good evidence of reflection and self-evaluation that revisits the development of the integrated unit. |
Strong evidence of reflection and self-evaluation in narrative which considers both planning and implementation of integrated unit. |
|
|
Presentation of Product |
NAEYC 5; |
Some errors in grammar, spelling and/or format; appears rushed and careless. |
Few grammatical, spelling and/or stylistic errors; clear, uncluttered and attractive presentation of product. |
Nearly error-free which reflects clear understanding and thorough proofreading; evidence that pride and care was taken and the message of the product is clearly defined. |
|