ECED 3172 Guiding Young Children (Ages 3-5) Evaluation of Environments: NAEYC: 1,3a,4,5d
	Below Expectations	Meets Expectations	Exceeds Expectations		Your Score
Demonstrates the understanding and application of visibility of design in DRAWINGS of both outdoor and indoor spaces	Does not meet expectations. Drawings are messy, cluttered, uneasy to follow and/or illogical and hard to read and follow	Meets expectations. Drawings are adequate, neat, easy to follow, and clearly designed	Exceeds expectations. Drawings are exceptional with details, labeled clearly, easy to follow and visually attractive to the "eye".
Demonstrates the understanding of evaluating play spaces. Narrative describes play space availability and arrangement of equipment in outdoor areas	Does not meet expectations. Written discussion describing the play spaces in outdoor areas is either omitted, too vague, too brief and/or not clear	Meets expectations. Written discussion describes play spaces in outdoor areas adequately and is easy to follow	Exceeds expectations. Written discussion describes play spaces in outdoor areas in great detail and is written with precise clarity.
Demonstrates the understanding of evaluating play spaces. Narrative describes safety and developmental appropriateness in outdoor areas	Does not met expectations. Written discussion describing the safety and developmental appropriateness in outdoor areas is either omitted, too vague, too brief, and/or not clear.	Meets expectations. Written discussion describing safety and developmental appropriateness in outdoor areas is adequate and easy to follow.	Exceeds expectations. Written discussion describing safety and developmental appropriateness in outdoor areas is in great detail and is written with precise clarity.
Demonstrates the understanding of evaluating play spaces. Narrative describes appropriateness to age-level motor capabilities in outdoor areas	Does not meet expectations. Written discussion describing the appropriateness to age-level motor capabilities in outdoor areas is either omitted, too vague, too brief, and/or not clear.	Meets expectations. Written discussion describing the appropriateness to age-level motor capabilities in outdoor areas is adequate and easy to follow.	Exceeds expectations. Written discussion describing the appropriateness to age-level motor capabilities in outdoor areas is in great detail and is written with precise clarity.
Demonstrates the understanding of evaluating play spaces. Narrative evaluates safety of indoor spaces	Does not meet expectations. Written discussion describing the safety of indoor spaces is either omitted, too vague, too brief, and/or not clear.	Meets expectations. Written discussion describing the safety of indoor spaces is adequate and easy to follow.	Exceeds expectations. Written discussion describing the safety of indoor spaces is in great detail and is written with precise clarity.
Demonstrates the understanding of engaging qualities of indoor spaces	Does not meet expectations. Written discussion describing the engaging qualities of indoor spaces is either omitted, too vague, too brief, and/or not clear.	Meets expectations. Written discussion describing the engaging qualities of indoor spaces is adequate and easy to follow.	Exceeds expectations. Written discussion describing the engaging qualities of indoor spaces is in great detail and is written with precise clarity.
Demonstrates the understanding of literacy supports of indoor spaces	Does not meet expectations. Written discussion describing the literacy supports of indoor spaces is either omitted, too vague, too brief, and/or not clear.	Meets expectations. Written discussion describing literacy supports of indoor spaces is adequate and easy to follow.	Exceeds expectations. Written discussion describing literacy supports of indoor spaces is in great detail and is written with precise clarity.
Demonstrates the understanding of multicultural emphasis of indoor spaces	Does not meet expectations. Written discussion describing the multicultural emphasis of indoor spaces is either omitted, too vague, too brief, and/or not clear.	Meets expectations. Written discussion describing the multicultural emphasis of indoor spaces is adequate and easy to follow.	Exceeds expectations. Written discussion describing the multicultural emphasis of indoor spaces is in great detail and is written with precise clarity
Demonstrates the understanding of support for special learners of indoor spaces	Does not meet expectations. Written discussion describing the support for special learners of indoor spaces is either omitted, too vague, too brief, and/or not clear.	Meets expectations. Written discussion describing the support for special learners of indoor spaces is adequate and easy to follow.	Exceeds expectations. Written discussion describing the support for special learners of indoor spaces is great in detail and is written with precise clarity.
Demonstrates the understanding of qualities that foster independence and self-regulation of indoor spaces	Does not meet expectations. Written discussion describing the qualities that foster independence and self-regulation of indoor spaces is either omitted, too vague, too brief, and/or not clear.	Meets expectations. Written discussion describing the qualities that foster independence and self-regulation of indoor spaces is adequate and easy to follow.	Exceeds expectations. Written discussion describing the qualities that foster independence and self-regulation of indoor spaces is great in detail and is with precise clarity.
COMMENTS